I’m picky about suitcases, especially carry-ons. It took me two years to find the right one. I’ve bought and returned so many suitcases that it’s now a running joke in our house: any time there’s a large box on our porch, Scott jokes that it’s my next failed suitcase.
For ages, I eyed my husband’s Int’l Tumi carry-on. The $600 – $800 price tag is more than I am willing to pay for any suitcase. Thus, my search began and two years later, I’ve got a carry-on I can fit into for a seven to ten day trip.
Here is the run down of a handful of the carry-on suitcases I tried. I looked at many other brands in stores, but all had the same point of failure. Read on.
If you’re willing to go wheel-less, this is the bag for you. It’s more spacious than any other carry-on. I was able to squeeze nearly twice the amount of clothes, shoes, and toiletries into this bag than any carry-on including my husband’s Int’l Tumi.
Downside here is the weight. I’m 5′ 3″ and athletic, but the constant pressure on my shoulder(s) makes travel uncomfortable if not miserable. The bag has backpack straps which helps, yet the weight is still too much for me.
This pales in comparison to it’s wheel-less cousin above. The hardware added to include wheels makes this bag anything but spacious. It’s bulky and out of balance — too much hardware for too little space.
I love Eagle Creek. My full size suitcase is Eagle Creek’s Tarmac AWD 30. Their carry-on version of the Tarmac just doesn’t cut it. Like so many others, the interior compartment houses too much of the suitcase’s hardware.
This is the suitcase my husband has. The two wheeled version has more space than any four wheeled Tumi carry-on. This suitcase is a winner, but at a high price point around $600. What makes this a winner is that unlike all of other wheeled carry-ons I looked at, this one has a simple interior design. The interior doesn’t have hardware taking up a good fourth of the cavity. This suitcase is almost a winner, but the price is too high.
Tumi Four Wheeled Suitcase
I can no longer find this one online. It’s like this one, but a lower price point. It’s bulky, the interior houses far too much of the hardware which takes up valuable space in the main compartment. Features like the plastic caps on every exterior corner are unnecessary and add weight and bulk. It’s narrower than many of the other rolling carry-ons I tested or looked at in stores. This is a Tumi fail.
And we have a winner. This suitcase has it all. Limited hardware sucking up valuable packing space in the main cavity in the suitcase. It’s lightweight (lighter than the four-wheeled Tumi carry-on). It’s $150. It’s expandable.
Key Failure Point
The failure point of most of the carry-ons is the amount of the hardware present in the main compartment of the carry-on. That coupled with excess builk in fabrics and compartments within the suitcase make for a carry-on with less space. Never trust the volume measurements of a suitcase; you must see the suitcase to know how much it can hold.